“After careful deliberation,
I have decided that the United States should take military action against
Syrian regime targets,” he said, describing himself as “prepared to give that
order.” The president’s hastily arranged remarks — demonstrators protesting
outside the White House gates could be heard from the West Wing only minutes
before he spoke — sucked the urgency out of what had looked like a imminent
military strike.
Instead, cruise missile-carrying warships off Syria’s coast will have to wait until the week of Sept. 9. That’s when Congress returns from a month-long vacation to take up a measure, drafted by the White House, giving Obama the green-light.
Instead, cruise missile-carrying warships off Syria’s coast will have to wait until the week of Sept. 9. That’s when Congress returns from a month-long vacation to take up a measure, drafted by the White House, giving Obama the green-light.
“I’m the president of the
world’s oldest constitutional democracy," Obama said. "I will seek
authorization for the use of force from the American people's representatives
in Congress."
But senior administration
officials briefing reporters at the White House later said that Obama still
believes he has the legal authority to act without congressional support —
meaning that a “no” vote would not necessarily handcuff his foreign policy. And
they disputed that Obama risked setting a precedent that could limit the power
of future occupants of the Oval Office.
The same officials also
sidestepped repeated questions about what happens if Assad responds by stepping
up chemical attacks against rebels looking to oust him.
The president himself said
there was no sell-by-date for action. “Our capacity to execute this mission is
not time-sensitive; it will be effective tomorrow, or next week, or one month
from now,” he said. Obama’s decision came amid
public opinion polls showing four out of five Americans wanted the president to
seek lawmakers’ approval, and with more than 100 congressional signatures on a
pair of letters delivering the same message.
Obama has acknowledged
repeatedly that Americans are “war-weary” after a decade of conflict — and
worried about standing on the threshold of another escalating entanglement in
the Middle East. “This would not be an
open-ended intervention, we would not put boots on the ground,” he promised
Saturday. “Instead, our action would be designed to be limited in duration and
scope.”
The president said he had
spoken by telephone with Republican House Speaker John Boehner and Democratic
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and that they agreed with the timetable.
It also followed a series of
diplomatic setbacks: Russian opposition blocked a path through the United
Nations Security Council, and Britain’s parliament shocked the world Thursday
by voting against military action. France signed on, but its parliament planned
to debate the issue next week.
Denied both clear
international legal legitimacy and a robust “coalition of the willing,” facing
clear public resistance as well as a surprisingly assertive Congress, and
trapped by his own declaration that Syria had crossed a “red line,” Obama went
from saying he would “consult” Capitol Hill to actively courting its support.
The senior aides briefing
reporters after Obama’s remarks suggested that he had largely settled on a
course of action in an Aug. 24 National Security Council meeting, but did not
make a final decision about using force until Friday. No one — not Obama, not
senior aides, not congressional leaders — had suggested securing congressional
approval.
And then, sometime around 6
p.m. ET, Obama went for a 45-minute stroll around the South Lawn of the White
House with Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, the aides said. During that walk,
the president said that he wanted to go to Congress.
A two-hour meeting, from
about 7 p to 9 p.m., followed with senior aides during which Obama to shared
the same message. Some aides argued against that course-correction, the
officials told reporters.
But by the time a National
Security Council meeting wrapped up on Saturday, they were all on board, the
aides said.
And they detailed the coming
campaign to get Congress on board:
- Hammer home the potential
threat to staunch ally Israel’s security
- Provide detailed
intelligence about the alleged attack
- Underline that the United
States ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention, and make a case that American
legitimacy — not just his own — is at stake.
-
Make the argument that failure to act could lead, one day, to terrorists
acquiring chemical weapons from regimes like Assad’s — and turning them on
America.
No comments:
Post a Comment